A platform that claims to run your fundraising on its own, with no detail about where it stops, isn’t describing software you can trust with a funder relationship. This runs grant research, scoring, drafting, application submission, and donor and corporate-giving outreach as one connected system — but every stage that could reach a funder, a donor, or a contact has its own explicit autonomy setting, off until an owner or admin turns it on.
Not a mockup — the live Autonomous Agent Settings screen for a real organization account, captured from a running instance of the application.
The full breakdown of every gate — the exact risk-score threshold, what triggers a CAPTCHA pause, and how a draft actually gets approved — lives on the Human-in-the-Loop AI page, not repeated here.
Grant fundraising and donor/corporate-giving outreach share an organization profile but run as genuinely separate systems underneath — there isn’t one unified activity feed across both yet.
Turning on every autonomy toggle produces more work for a reviewer, not less work overall — the approval queues fill faster, they don’t disappear. Nightly caps bound the volume; they don’t remove the review step.
Run the free Funding Potential Scan first, a short, no-signup check of the kind of funding your organization is likely to qualify for.
A full walkthrough covers every lane and every autonomy toggle, so you decide what to turn on and when.